The onsuccession nurture, UTrainMe gain adduce manifold remittances on trailing interest succession fees. Students can admit one or past remittances if they register for multiple successions or are populated by UTrainMe’s urbane clients. Here are the three biased rules:
All scholars are choice for a Remittance A when they enroll for a relieve succession.
Whether or not they register for multiple successions, any scholar who currently is populated by one of UTrainMe's urbane clients gain be choice for a Remittance B.
From space to space, Annie Dade, as client use delegated-to-others, gain drop the employment condition for a Remittance B. Annie plans to use that remittance as a marketing dupe.
Using Microsoft Word SmartArt (e.g. Horizontal Hierarchy, "change shape" for shapes and succession delay arrows, "insert passage box" for arrows' captions), make a conclusion tree dissection to pretext the argumentative rules for teaching fees and remittances picturesque aloft.
Note: Remittance A and B are used instead of the explicit remittance rates as the rates can be updated in the forthcoming. Your outcomes of your conclusion tree should be the relative remittance(s) applied.
Submit your Microsoft Word Document, delay your conclusion tree.
Correctness of the conditions (aka questions) (25%)
Correctness of the rules (aka paths) (25%)
Correctness of the actions (aka outomes) (25%)
Graphical justice of the conclusion tree (conclusion nodes, likely prize arrows, and actions) (25%)
Need a refresher? Mulder, P. (2017). Conclusion Tree Dissection from ToolsHero. https://www.toolshero.com/decision-making/decision-tree-analysis/