Follow the guide carefully due june 18 monday

Guided Response: Respond to a reserve of two classmates. How were their ideas of technology promoting unanalogousiation unanalogous from your own? How does their viewpoint enlarge your own?  Consider their perspective on the erudition environment. Provide unfair feedback respecting their perspective in similarity delay your own. I conciliate connect mine to succor you delay my two peers arguments. No  word estimate for the two peers. Kyshae Biggs EDU 645: Week 3 Discussion What proof did you see and incline by watching Mr. Pronovost Differentiating Order Through Interactive Games (Links to an exterior locality.) Links to an exterior locality. That supports what has been knowing thus far respecting enhancement & communicating erudition externals, using the slow liberate pattern, giving feedback, and rate? Mr. Pronovost uses the slow liberate pattern polite-mannered-mannered in his classroom. He begins his homily by communicating the erudition externals for the day. He does this in a assembly argument balance analysis and disconnection. This term allows him to go balance orders delay gleaners and assess to indicate which gleaners conciliate do polite-mannered-mannered fruiting unconnectedly and which gleaners he conciliate need to centre on partially. As the day stirs on gleaners fruit unconnectedly through technology, which is a indisputable educational utensil that provides gleaner feedback which builds trust in their erudition experiences. How does he unfairally edifice his homily to solder technology? How does using technology aid unanalogousiation? He guided gleaners until most of his gleaners implicit the concepts. This is when he stird the homily on to solder technology. I truly approve how Mr. Pronovost gave his gleaners a value of accountability anteriorly they could stir on to other activities. I venerate this gave them an inducement to assemble on the homily and do their best. Technology aids unanalogousiation by providing gleaners the turn to rouse their fruit at a roll they impress most satisfied, fruit at their own gait, and provides direct feedback to submit prosperity in the classroom. What proof is there of varying rolls of cognition? Mr. Pronovost submitd his gleaners to use all the utensils that are profitable to them. In doing so he explained that they do not affect to lean on the computers but can transcribe out their math problems and/or use their hands to symbol them out. I venerate this shows the unanalogous rolls of cognition being used in this classroom. How do you venerate this sign of erudition environment establishs gleaners impress about their capabilities delay math? Why? I hold this sign of erudition environment would establish gleaners impress satisfied as they glean what they are desirable of erudition in math timeliness fabric trust as they speed and overpower each concept. Owing the pedagogue is effectively forcible and unanalogousiating their erudition through the slow liberate pattern. Emmanuel Morris What proof did you see and incline by watching Mr. Pronovost Differentiating Order Through Interactive Games (Links to an exterior locality.)Links to an exterior locality.that supports what has been knowing thus far respecting enhancement & communicating erudition externals, using the slow liberate pattern, giving feedback, and rate?               The proof that I saw and inclined by watching Mr. Pronovost using the slow liberate pattern, giving feedback and rate was giving gleaners what they needed, and allowing technology to confront the gleaner's needs.Mr. Pronovost accustomed using elimination utterance delay his gleaners to confirm if gleaners would add or remove. Once he felt that gleaners affect gotten the poise of their math axioms he then stird them to computers. The slow liberate pattern was implemented in the classroom by the "I do it, We do it, You do it concertedly, You do it quaint. He undisputed gleaners to fruit unconnectedly on the computers on Planet Turtle. Planet Turtle is an educational math locality that allows gleaners to manner their math axioms. Mr. Pronovost used Planet Turtle to asses his gleaners, and they would affect to overpower 80% math axioms chasten to stir ready. How does he unfairally edifice his homily to solder technology? How does using technology aid unanalogousiation?        Mr. Pronovost edificed his homily to solder technology by allowing gleaners to use iPods, or Macbooks to manner delay their math axioms. The iPod touch was a precious way for gleaners to manner a undoubtful manoeuvre or play. The MacBooks cheered them in another way delay their roll lection or unanalogousiated math order. This aids unanalogousiated order owing Mr. Pronovost implemented over than one way for gleaners to glean math and imply confront the external of the assignment. He undisputed gleaners to do rebellious manner and undisputed gleaners to use whatever manoeuvre fruited for them to get the proper retort. He besides gave his gleaners individualized order at their own roll. What proof is there of varying rolls of cognition? Confirm the rolls of Depth of Attainments (DOK) you observed gleaners reaching during the manifold stages of the homily.             The proof of varying rolls of cognition, Mr. Pronovost undisputed gleaners to confirm elimination utterance to indicate whether they were going to "add or remove". The Depth of attainments I observed gleaners reaching during the manifold staged of the homily is implying how to add and repropel using strategies that are salutary to their erudition needs. Besides by Mr. Pronovost allowing gleaners to stir at their own gait of erudition. Planet Turtle is used to revive the order of math.  How do you venerate this sign of erudition environment establishs gleaners impress about their capabilities delay math? Why?         This sign of erudition environment establishs gleaners impress numerous about their capabilities delay math owing Mr. Pronovost solders educational plays to establish math fun and interesting.  When gleaners see that they affect passed and produced a numerous job delay the homily online, it concedes them submitment to insufficiency to glean over and concede them immanent to excel in math